Who We Are US Division Canada Division Product Information Management Partners Careers Advertising Opportunities Press Releases Reed In The News
Construction Project Leads BIM SmartBuilding Index Construction Costs (RSMeans) Market / Predictive Analytics Building Product Information Daily Commercial News Journal of Commerce B2B Marketing Construction Market Research
SmartBIM Market Insights Connections RSMeans SmartBuzz accessArchitecture Green Construction US Construction Canadian Construction
Building Products Construction Projects Building Codes Building Types Building Cost Models Companies eNewsletters Blogs Ask Our Experts Events RSS Feeds
Upload Plans & Specs
Construction Market analytics and forecasting community header

Notes from Alex Carrick

Insight and Analysis of Construction Industry Trends
Get RSS Feed

Account Access

Regional Markets

Alex Carrick avatar

Join the Discussion

Points (5) through (8) are a continuation of the discussion that began in yesterday’s Blog entry. There are a range of challenges and threats facing Alberta’s Tar Sands projects.

(5) An environmental backlash: Bucket wheel excavating and huge tailing ponds of spent water and residual sulphur are scarring the landscape. The new SAGD (steam- assisted gravity drainage) technology does not impact the surface environment to the same degree. However, I recently read an oil executive’s comment that the new technology permits 90% of used water to be recycled. That’s fine, but what about the other 10%? These plants use an awful lot of potable water.

(6) A carbon tax: A carbon tax was just introduced in next-door British Columbia’s provincial budget. It is the first jurisdiction in North America to do so. The charge is proposed to be $15 per tonne of greenhouse gases. Alberta has already indicated that it may bring in a similar fee. However, others in the country are suggesting that the charge may have to be as high as $50 per tonne to bring about enough change for Canada to meet its Kyoto clean-air targets by 2020. At that level, the tax becomes considerably more prohibitive to new investment.

(7) A plunge in the price of oil: The rise in demand for automobiles in China alone makes a significant drop in the world price of oil unlikely over the longer term. Plus, there are ongoing geopolitical problems in many oil-producing nations. Furthermore, oil would probably have to drop below $60 U.S. per barrel (my own guess) to make much of an impact on Tar Sands investment.

(8) An alternative energy breakthrough: It is possible to imagine a new energy technology breaking away from the pack (e.g., diesel, solar, fuel-cell, biofuel, etc.) and reducing the world’s dependence on gasoline. Something may be percolating in the wings, but it’s not readily apparent as yet.

A means must be found to work through these eight issues in a co-operative and positive way. While it may not seem like it, there probably is only a limited window of opportunity for Canada to take advantage of the bonanza that has been offered up in the form of the “black-gold(en) goose” that is Alberta’s Tar Sands.

Alex Carrick

Member Comments 

» View all comments (0 total comments)
Post Your Own Comments 
» Not a member? Register now to become one. Otherwise, login to post your comments on this article.

Read Other Recent Alex Carrick Posts

   Community Login | Register

Search SmartBuilding Index

Advanced Search


What's Hot

Take a Demo!


Recent News

E Newsletter

Do You Know?

With over 75 different building models, Square Foot Estimator lets you create conceptual estimates online in minutes.

Get a 7 day FREE trial!


Resource Center

© 2009 Reed Construction Data Inc. All rights reserved.