Who We Are US Division Canada Division Product Information Management Partners Careers Advertising Opportunities Press Releases Reed In The News
Construction Project Leads BIM SmartBuilding Index Construction Costs (RSMeans) Market / Predictive Analytics Building Product Information Daily Commercial News Journal of Commerce B2B Marketing Construction Market Research
SmartBIM Market Insights Connections RSMeans SmartBuzz accessArchitecture Green Construction US Construction Canadian Construction
Search Project Leads Building Product Information Regional News & Info Building Codes Building Cost Models Project Library by Building Type eNewsletters Blogs Ask Our Experts Events
Upload Plans & Specs
RSMeans Bookstore Preorder 2010 Cost Data SmartProject News

Minimizing the Size of Family Files (Revit Objects)

December 10, 2008 - Dennis Neeley

Featured in:

Related Articles :

Abstract:
The power of BIM is pronominal. Stretch the side of the building and walls, floors, roof, ceilings and all the related drawings change, take a door out of any view and it leaves your project and disappears from every view where the door could be seen. Check for conflicts and the software tells you where pipes are hitting structural members.
» read entire article
Comments
12/11/2008 - posted by John Hoffmann

I know that we live in the electronic (supposedly paperless) age, but occasionally it is helpful to have a hard copy of these electronic articles.  Is BIM Smart enough to make available a print version of all of these informative articles?
Thank you for your consideration.
JLH

12/15/2008 - posted by Phyllis Robbins

With all your testing, have you also evaluated performance as well as file size?  Our internal testing verifies your information about size but this is only part of the issue.  When you use 3D content with shapes and extrusions that display in all views, the size is less important than the performance hit.  We have found that whenever Revit must calculate view depth and cut planes for modeled elements to insure correct display that the performance when going from view to view is compromised.  Also, we have found that very small but complex families, particularly with array formaulas, may not compromise model size but most definitely compromise performance.

Family size is only part of the issue.  In our larger projects, it is less important than performance and family function.

03/09/2009 - posted by Justin Martin

Nice article. Although not the intention of the article, it would seem that you would also need to factor in the time it takes to create 3D parametric objects vs. any of the others. Depending on the object and how you want to have it flex, one could easily get more time involved in fighting with the way Revit thinks than it might be worth (depending on the situation).

Post Your Own Comments 
» Not a member? Register now to become one. Otherwise, login to post your comments on this article.
   Community Login | Register

Search Site

Advanced Search


What's Hot

Take a Demo!


Recent News

E Newsletter

Do You Know?

World-class customer support is based in our Norcross, Georgia headquarters.

Learn more!


Resource Center

© 2009 Reed Construction Data Inc. All rights reserved.