Construction Business Management


Securing People

Before developing a security program, it is necessary to assess the people and property to be protected. We will begin with our most important concern, people — employees and tenants, contractors, and visitors — even the unwelcome or uninvited ones.

Providing safety and security for the official work force (including full- and part-time contract workers and temporary workers) is the highest priority and a primary responsibility. Solely from an asset perspective (despite attempts to reduce reliance on particular individuals), an organization’s work force remains one of its most valuable commodities. The loss or incapacity of key personnel could result in temporary or permanent loss of vital information and resources.

Public Image
To assess personal risk, it is helpful to examine the organization’s public image — with an objective and even cynical point of view. This assessment may produce a few surprises and a list of possible targets within a facility or organization.

During the year 2000, there were over 23,000 violent acts committed on various employees in all areas of employment in the United States, and these are just the ones that were reported.

Targets for assault include:

Within the general business community

  • Executives, officers, or other key personnel — vulnerable by virtue of their positions and actual or perceived responsibilities, which some employees, customers, or others could find sufficiently offensive to wish to injure or kill them. (The Unabomber killed and maimed out of a misguided sense of outrage at individuals he did not even know, but whom he believed represented industries injurious to society.)
  • Human Resources Personnel — susceptible because of their role in terminations of employment.
  • Employees at any level — as potential victims of violence connected with personal relationships.
  • Men — according to the Justice Department, are the victims of 80% of all workplace violence. Most are executives, managers, or other key personnel. Women share an increasing vulnerability in these same roles.

In specific industries or fields

  • Operators of facilities that generate (or are perceived to generate) pollution — electrical utilities, nuclear plants, petroleum refineries and chemical plants, and large-scale farming operations.
  • Other entities perceived as threats to the environment — lumbering companies involved in clear-cutting or lumbering old-growth forests, or electric utilities whose hydroelectric dams result in backwaters or drain wetlands.
  • Researchers whose work involves animals or breeders of
  • fur-bearing animals — potential targets of animal rights activists.
  • Abortion clinic workers — vulnerable to violence from extreme “right-to-life” groups or individuals.
  • Healthcare workers who may be victims of a distraught relative or friend of a patient — and patients who may be accidental victims of an event.
  • According to the Bureau of Justice National Crime Victimization Survey, 69,500 nurses were assaulted at work from 1992-1996.
  • The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health reports that 9,000 healthcare providers are attacked on the job every day.
  • Bureau of Labor Statistics figures for 1999 show that 43% of all non-fatal assaults and violent acts resulting in lost workdays across all industries occurred in health services.

Government facilities and public buildings

  • Large facilities used for sports or entertainment venues.
  • Transportation facilities, such as rail lines and railroad and bus depots and marshalling yards, airports, hangars, fuel bunkering facilities, ship docks, container facilities, warehouses, and storage facilities.
  • Police, firefighters, and other security workers.
  • Students and faculty — either as direct targets of disturbed individuals or as accidental victims of a collateral event.

It is nearly impossible to define all of the facilities and/or individuals who may find themselves at risk or in danger. Consequently, a security assessment committee or group must try to think in terms of protecting their facility and its users from completely undefined or unanticipated sources, as well as from the more commonly considered sources. The above list simply highlights some of the people and facilities that may be at increased risk.

This article was adapted from Building Security: Strategies and Costs by David D. Owen. Click here to read an expanded excerpt.


RSS Feed

Member Comments

Post Your Own Comments 
» Not a member? Register now to become one. Otherwise, login to post your comments on this article.

click here to update your log-in and member information

click here to maintain your company profile & view metrics