This is a post from Jim Haughey's blog that covers the US construction industry.
Jim Haughey is the Chief Economist for Reed Construction Data and has over thirty years experience as a business economist, including twenty years monitoring the construction market. He has a Ph.D. degree in economics from the University of Michigan and has previously taught at the University of Michigan, Ohio University, Michigan State University and the University of Massachusetts.
Go to Jim Haughey's blog home
Construction Industry Forecasts
Notes from Jim Haughey - Jun 09, 2011
There is a good chance that the constructions unions will accept these work rule changes. During the last few years they leaned a basic lesson in economics. People will buy more of an item whose price declines relative to substitutable items. More efficient work rules (and wage concessions) prompted more union construction work in New York City when it became relatively less expensive compared to non-union construction in the city and any construction elsewhere. For many projects, using a non-union contractor or moving the building project outside the city are acceptable substitutes to union projects in the city.
The New York City construction unions are also aware that they no longer have the full support of Mayor Bloomberg and Governor Cuomo who are both slashing inefficient work practices by public employee unions that add to operating and especially benefit and pension costs.


