Who We Are US Division Canada Division Product Information Management Partners Careers Advertising Opportunities Press Releases Reed In The News
Construction Project Leads BIM SmartBuilding Index Construction Costs (RSMeans) Market / Predictive Analytics Building Product Information Daily Commercial News Journal of Commerce B2B Marketing Construction Market Research
SmartBIM Market Insights Connections RSMeans SmartBuzz accessArchitecture Green Construction US Construction Canadian Construction
Search Project Leads Building Product Information Regional News & Info Building Codes Building Cost Models Project Library by Building Type eNewsletters Blogs Ask Our Experts Events
Upload Plans & Specs
RSMeans Bookstore Preorder 2010 Cost Data SmartProject News
home news index rsmeans’ dollars-per-square-foot construction costs: four industrial shell types of structure

RSMeans’ dollars-per-square-foot construction costs: Four industrial shell types of structure

October 07, 2009 - Alex Carrick

Featured in:

Join the Discussion!

Accompanying this report are tables and charts based on RSMeans’ measures of dollar-per-square-foot construction costs. The results for 25 major cities are shown for four “industrial shell” types of structure. Means has updated specifications with regard to its building cost models for an auto sales garage and a warehouse. For this reason, it is not valid to directly compare this year’s figures with last year’s in those two categories. That is why the percentage change column reads “not applicable.” Specifications for the other two categories are comparable and percentage changes, year over year, are shown. 

Ranking by expense

Among the four categories set out in the table and graphs, it is most expensive to build a factory. The second-most expensive is an auto sales garage. Third spot belongs to an aircraft hangar. In last position, and a considerable step down from the other three, is a warehouse. It is almost one-quarter, or 25%, cheaper to build a warehouse than a three-story factory, on a square footage basis.

New York is the most expensive; cities in the South are least expensive

New York has the highest dollar-per-square-foot construction costs in the country. San Francisco, Boston, Chicago and Philadelphia round out the top five. Relatively low-cost cities are mainly in the southeast and southwest, including Miami, Atlanta, Phoenix, Houston and Dallas.

The nation’s capital, Washington, is in the low mid-range for construction costs among the 25 cities considered in the table and graphs. The same holds true for Pittsburgh and Denver. Seattle, Detroit and St. Louis are in the upper mid-range. In California, dollar-per-square foot construction costs in Los Angeles and San Diego are between 13% and 16% lower than in San Francisco.

Some city comparisons

It is interesting to make some regional comparisons. It now costs about 31% more to build in Chicago than in Atlanta. The relationship is about the same (27%) between higher-cost Philadelphia and lower-cost Miami. The mark-up in New York, the most expensive city among the 25 shown, and Winston-Salem, N.C., the least expensive, is nearly three quarters or 74%.

Percentage changes restrained by recession

The year-over-year percentage change calculation is valid in the two categories for which specifications have been kept the same. The 25-city average is +4.2% for a three-story factory and +3.8% for an aircraft hangar. Chicago has recorded the largest year-over-year gain in construction costs. With the economy struggling, construction costs are being restrained as well. However, some movement in underlying commodity prices is already underway and the hiatus for construction costs may not last much beyond early next year.

U.S. Dollars per Square Foot Construction Costs –
By Type of Structure – September 2009
    MAJOR CITIES
(alphabetically)
factory (three stories)
AUTO SALES GARAGE
2009 2008   % Change 2009 2008   % Change
1   ATLANTA $99.66 $96.68   3.1% $96.65 $87.20   n/a
2   BALTIMORE 103.60 99.22   4.4% 100.46 89.49   n/a
3   BOSTON 131.61 124.97   5.3% 127.63 112.72   n/a
4   CHICAGO 130.33 122.86   6.1% 126.39 110.81   n/a
5   CLEVELAND 111.12 107.45   3.4% 107.76 96.91   n/a
6   DALLAS 95.61 91.30   4.7% 92.72 82.35   n/a
7   DENVER 105.91 102.17   3.7% 102.71 92.15   n/a
8   DETROIT 116.10 110.93   4.7% 112.59 100.06   n/a
9   HOUSTON 97.58 93.73   4.1% 94.63 84.54   n/a
10   KANSAS CITY 115.63 111.57   3.6% 112.14 100.63   n/a
11   LOS ANGELES 121.31 115.89   4.7% 117.64 104.53   n/a
12   MIAMI 102.09 96.68   5.6% 99.00 87.20   n/a
13   MINNEAPOLIS 125.13 119.59   4.6% 121.34 107.86   n/a
14   NEW ORLEANS 98.50 94.26   4.5% 95.52 85.01   n/a
15   NEW YORK CITY 149.55 142.70   4.8% 145.03 128.71   n/a
16   PHILADELPHIA 129.41 123.28   5.0% 125.50 111.19   n/a
17   PHOENIX 99.66 95.73   4.1% 96.65 86.35   n/a
18   PITTSBURGH 111.93 106.50   5.1% 108.55 96.06   n/a
19   PORTLAND 111.35 109.77   1.4% 107.98 99.01   n/a
20   ST. LOUIS 115.06 111.25   3.4% 111.58 100.34   n/a
21   SAN DIEGO 117.49 113.26   3.7% 113.93 102.15   n/a
22   SAN FRANCISCO 139.02 132.89   4.6% 134.81 119.86   n/a
23   SEATTLE 117.49 111.36   5.5% 113.93 100.44   n/a
24   WASHINGTON, DC 110.89 107.34   3.3% 107.54 96.82   n/a
25   WINSTON-SALEM 85.89 84.44   1.7% 83.29 76.16   n/a
MAJOR CITIES
(alphabetically)
warehouse aircraft hangar
2009 2008 % Change 2009 2008 % Change
1   ATLANTA $76.97 $71.49   n/a $90.84 $88.44   2.7%
2   BALTIMORE 80.01 73.37   n/a 94.42 90.76   4.0%
3   BOSTON 101.65 92.41   n/a 119.95 114.32   4.9%
4   CHICAGO 100.66 90.85   n/a 118.79 112.38   5.7%
5   CLEVELAND 85.82 79.45   n/a 101.28 98.29   3.0%
6   DALLAS 73.84 67.51   n/a 87.14 83.52   4.3%
7   DENVER 81.80 75.55   n/a 96.53 93.46   3.3%
8   DETROIT 89.67 82.03   n/a 105.82 101.47   4.3%
9   HOUSTON 75.36 69.31   n/a 88.94 85.74   3.7%
10   KANSAS CITY 89.31 82.50   n/a 105.39 102.05   3.3%
11   LOS ANGELES 93.69 85.70   n/a 110.56 106.01   4.3%
12   MIAMI 78.85 71.49   n/a 93.05 88.44   5.2%
13   MINNEAPOLIS 96.64 88.43   n/a 114.05 109.39   4.3%
14   NEW ORLEANS 76.08 69.70   n/a 89.78 86.22   4.1%
15   NEW YORK CITY 115.50 105.52   n/a 136.31 130.54   4.4%
16   PHILADELPHIA 99.95 91.16   n/a 117.95 112.77   4.6%
17   PHOENIX 76.97 70.79   n/a 90.84 87.57   3.7%
18   PITTSBURGH 86.45 78.75   n/a 102.02 97.42   4.7%
19   PORTLAND 86.00 81.17   n/a 101.49 100.41   1.1%
20   ST. LOUIS 88.86 82.26   n/a 104.87 101.76   3.1%
21   SAN DIEGO 90.74 83.75   n/a 107.08 103.60   3.4%
22   SAN FRANCISCO 107.37 98.26   n/a 126.71 121.56   4.2%
23   SEATTLE 90.74 82.34   n/a 107.08 101.86   5.1%
24   WASHINGTON, DC 85.65 79.38   n/a 101.07 98.19   2.9%
25   WINSTON-SALEM 66.33 62.44   n/a 78.28 77.24   1.3%
Data source: Reed Construction Data – RSMeans.
Tables: Reed Construction Data – CanaData

Factory (three stories) construction cost:
September 2009 ranking of major U.S. cities
U.S.
Auto sales garage construction cost:
September 2009 ranking of major U.S. cities
U.S.
Warehouse construction cost:
September 2009 ranking of major U.S. cities
U.S.
Aircraft hangar construction cost:
August 2009 ranking of major U.S. cities
U.S.
These charts and tables were abstracted from RSMeans cost data publications for the A/E/C industry. For more information about RSMeans Square Foot Cost Guide and RSMeans CCI (Construction Cost Index), which indexes square foot costs for cities in the U.S. and Canada, visit the online bookstore at www.rsmeans.com and click on cost data publications (or call 1-800-448-8182). “n/a” means not applicable. Recent adjustments to specifications mean that year-over-year percentage changes will not be valid in 2009.
Data source: Reed Construction Data – RSMeans (www.rsmeans.com).
Charts: Reed Construction Data – CanaData
See latest articles on economy & finance

Member Comments

» View all comments (0 total comments)
Post Your Own Comments 
» Not a member? Register now to become one. Otherwise, login to post your comments on this article.

Related News & Information

Related Channels

   Community Login | Register

Search Site

Advanced Search


What's Hot

Take a Demo!


Recent News

E Newsletter

Do You Know?

Demand for actionable leads growing in a tight economy.

Learn More!


Resource Center

© 2009 Reed Construction Data Inc. All rights reserved.