Who We Are US Division Canada Division Product Information Management Partners Careers Advertising Opportunities Press Releases Reed In The News
Construction Project Leads BIM SmartBuilding Index Construction Costs (RSMeans) Business Solutions Market / Predictive Analytics Building Product Information Daily Commercial News Journal of Commerce B2B Marketing Custom Market Research
accessArchitecture Connections Green Construction Market Insights RSMeans SmartBIM SmartBuzz US Construction Canadian Construction
Search Project Leads Building Product Information Regional News & Info Building Codes Building Cost Models Project Library by Building Type eNewsletters Blogs Ask Our Experts Events
Upload Plans & Specs
RSMeans Bookstore SmartProject News
home news index rsmeans reports u.s. construction costs remain under wraps early in 2010

RSMeans reports U.S. construction costs remain under wraps early in 2010

March 03, 2010 - Alex Carrick

Featured in:

Join the Discussion!

RSMeans’ Construction Cost Index for 30 major cities remained under wraps for the latest reporting period, January 2010. The year-over-year change was negligible, at only -0.5%. The quarter-to-quarter change annualized was +1.3%. The sharpest quarter-to-quarter annualized decline in the index was most recently recorded in April 2009, at -7.9%. The greatest quarter-to-quarter annualized increase in the index occurred in July 2008, at +18.5%. July 2008 was when world oil prices were at their all-time peak as they climbed in excess of US$140 per barrel.

Materials and labor

The year-over-year change for the materials sub-index in January 2010 was -4.8%. The changes were also negative as reported in October 2009 (-6.5%) and July 2009 (-4.7%). On a quarter-over-quarter annualized basis, the material component sub-index increased 0.4% in January 2010. Oil prices have recovered halfway between their peak level and their trough point in early 2009.

In the most recent 12 months for material costs, weakness has been particularly noted in concrete reinforcing (-30.7% year over year), metal joists and decking (-26.2% y/y), plaster and gypsum board (-15.2% y/y), ceilings and acoustic treatment (-13.8% y/y) and structural metal framing (-8.8% y/y). The quarter-to-quarter price changes in those components, with the exception of ceilings and acoustic treatment, have moderated considerably to a range of -3.0% to +1.0%.

The installation or labor component in the index was +2.4% annualized in January 2010. The year-over-year change in the 30-city average hourly rate for skilled workers (i.e. 20 trades) was +4.6%. This reflects gains that are protected under union contract, where work is available. The compensation rates for the non-unionized sector of construction are undoubtedly much lower.

The outlook

The outlook for construction costs depends on market demand and commodity prices. National homebuilding remains sluggish, but should start to pick up in the second half of this year. Privately-financed non-residential building construction will remain largely depressed until labor markets show signs of improving. However, a better foundation is being set in place with the improvement in corporate profits of the last several quarters, the exceptionally low interest rates and an easing of credit that will gather momentum as long as the economy avoids a double dip in activity levels. Engineering work is receiving a boost from Washington’s stimulus spending, although tax-deprived state and local governments will hold off on many capital projects.

Commodity prices are being prodded upward by exceptional growth overseas. China and Southeast Asian nations are forging ahead with output levels in excess of expectations. Demand for steel, concrete, copper, nickel and other minerals and metals will provide prices with an upward bias. The earthquake in Chile sent copper prices skyrocketing, but this will settle back down as it becomes clear that demand is not yet ready to absorb all non-Chilean mining supplies.

RSMeans construction cost Index (CCI) – U.S. 30 city average January 2010
U.S.
*Year over year is quarter versus same quarter, previous year.
**Annualized is quarter to quarter compounded for annual growth rate (i.e., (Qt/Qt-1)4-1).

Materials sub-component of CCI – latest movements   Installation/Labor Sub-component of CCI – latest movements
U.S.   U.S.
30-city average hourly labor rates for skilled workers
(20 trades) (including fringe benefits)
U.S.
Per cent changes are mid-year to mid-year (except for the final column which is Jan 10 vs Jan 09).
Data source: RSMeans (www.rsmeans.com)/Table: Reed Construction Data - CanaData.
RSMeans measures of U.S. city construction costs – January 2010
  Highest to Lowest Cost (relative to 30-city national average)       Year-over-Year
% Change
      Quarter-to-Quarter
% Change (ANNUALIZED)
Rank january 2010     Rank jan 10 vs jan 09     Rank jan 10 vs oct 09
                         
1 New York 132.9%     1 Jacksonville 2.2%     1 Hartford 6.9%
2 San Francisco 122.8%     2 Seattle 1.8%     2 Cincinnati 3.7%
3 Honolulu 118.2%     3 Tampa 1.5%     3 Cleveland 3.4%
4 Boston 118.0%     4 Boston 1.2%     4 San Antonio 3.0%
5 Oakland 117.2%     5 Las Vegas 1.1%     5 Boston 2.8%
6 San José 116.4%     6 Chicago 0.8%     6 Stamford 2.8%
7 Chicago 116.0%     7 New York 0.6%     7 Dallas 2.6%
8 Philadelphia 115.3%     8 Hartford 0.6%     8 Toledo 2.5%
9 Stamford 112.2%     9 Denver 0.3%     9 Pittsburgh 2.5%
10 Minneapolis 112.2%     10 Minneapolis 0.3%     10 Baltimore 2.4%
11 Hartford 110.0%     11 Pittsburgh 0.3%     11 Columbus 2.4%
12 Sacramento 108.3%     12 Tucson 0.3%     12 Denver 2.4%
13 Los Angeles 107.3%     13 Salt Lake City 0.3%     13 Minneapolis 2.2%
14 Las Vegas 106.7%     14 Kansas City 0.3%     14 Austin 2.0%
15 Providence 106.2%     15 Providence -0.1%     15 Philadelphia 1.9%
16 Seattle 105.6%     16 Philadelphia -0.1%     16 Indianapolis 1.9%
17 San Diego 103.6%     17 Milwaukee -0.1%     17 Providence 1.7%
18 Wilmington 103.4%     18 Detroit -0.2%     18 New York 1.5%
19 Detroit 103.2%     19 Buffalo -0.2%     19 Chicago 1.3%
20 Milwaukee 103.0%     20 Stamford -0.2%     20 Honolulu 1.3%
21 Kansas City 102.5%     21 Ft. Lauderdale -0.2%     21 Buffalo 1.3%
22 St. Louis 102.4%     22 Dallas -0.3%     22 Houston 1.3%
23 Buffalo 101.3%     23 Oakland -0.3%     23 New Orleans 1.3%
24 Portland 100.7%     24 Phoenix -0.4%     24 Charlotte 1.1%
25 Pittsburgh 100.4%     25 Portland -0.4%     25 Kansas City 1.1%
26 Cleveland 99.2%     26 Baltimore -0.5%     26 Detroit 1.1%
27 Washington 98.6%     27 Columbus -0.5%     27 Seattle 0.8%
28 Toledo 97.2%     28 Wilmington -0.6%     28 Norfolk 0.8%
29 Denver 95.0%     29 St. Louis -0.7%     29 Washington 0.7%
30 Columbus 93.8%     30 Sacramento -0.7%     30 Salt Lake City 0.5%
31 Baltimore 92.7%     31 Cleveland -0.8%     31 St. Louis 0.4%
32 Indianapolis 92.6%     32 San Francisco -0.8%     32 Milwaukee 0.4%
33 Tampa 92.2%     33 Orlando -0.9%     33 Las Vegas 0.4%
34 Cincinnati 91.7%     34 Los Angeles -0.9%     34 Memphis 0.3%
35 Miami 89.9%     35 Cincinnati -1.0%     35 Los Angeles 0.2%
36 Orlando 89.5%     36 New Orleans -1.0%     36 Wilmington -0.2%
37 Salt Lake City 88.6%     37 Toledo -1.1%     37 Atlanta -0.2%
38 Phoenix 88.5%     38 Miami -1.2%     38 Tucson -0.3%
39 Ft. Lauderdale 88.3%     39 Austin -1.2%     39 San José -0.4%
40 New Orleans 88.3%     40 San José -1.2%     40 Portland -0.4%
41 Atlanta 88.2%     41 Indianapolis -1.3%     41 Tampa -0.5%
42 Norfolk 87.0%     42 Washington -1.3%     42 Miami -0.5%
43 Houston 86.6%     43 San Diego -1.8%     43 Ft. Lauderdale -0.5%
44 Tucson 86.6%     44 Honolulu -1.8%     44 Jacksonville -0.5%
45 Nashville 86.3%     45 Memphis -1.9%     45 Orlando -0.7%
46 Jacksonville 85.6%     46 San Antonio -1.9%     46 Nashville -0.8%
47 Dallas 85.4%     47 Nashville -1.9%     47 San Diego -0.8%
48 Memphis 84.9%     48 Houston -2.2%     48 Oakland -0.9%
49 San Antonio 81.4%     49 Norfolk -2.4%     49 Phoenix -1.0%
50 Austin 79.7%     50 Atlanta -2.7%     50 Sacramento -1.0%
51 Charlotte 77.4%     51 Charlotte -3.2%     51 San Francisco -1.2%
  National 100.0%       National -0.5%       National 1.3%
Based on RSMeans' Construction Cost Indices (CCIs) for each city.
Data source: RSMeans (www.rsmeans.com)/Table: Reed Construction Data - CanaData.
See latest articles on economy & finance

Member Comments

» View all comments (0 total comments)
Post Your Own Comments 
» Register or Login to post your comments on this article

Related News & Information

Related Channels

   Community Login | Register

Search Site

Advanced Search


What's Hot

Take a Demo!


Recent News

E Newsletter

Do You Know?

World-class customer support is based in our Norcross, Georgia headquarters.

Learn more!


Resource Center

© 2010 Reed Construction Data Inc. All rights reserved. Any commercial use of this Site is strictly prohibited, except as provided in the Terms & Conditions or to the extent that we otherwise approve. To request approval to use Site content, please see our Reprint/Licensing page. | Privacy Policy

For inquiries concerning RBI Publications, please click here.