Who We Are US Division Canada Division Product Information Management Partners Careers Advertising Opportunities Press Releases Reed In The News
Construction Project Leads BIM SmartBuilding Index Construction Costs (RSMeans) Business Solutions Market / Predictive Analytics Building Product Information Daily Commercial News Journal of Commerce B2B Marketing Custom Market Research
accessArchitecture Connections Green Construction Market Insights RSMeans SmartBIM SmartBuzz US Construction Canadian Construction
Search Project Leads Building Product Information Regional News & Info Building Codes Building Cost Models Project Library by Building Type eNewsletters Blogs Ask Our Experts Events
Upload Plans & Specs
RSMeans Bookstore SmartProject News
home news index bim content — do we have enough

BIM Content — Do We Have Enough

June 14, 2010 - Mark Mergenschroer

Featured in:

Join the Discussion!

While attending the AIA Expo last week, there seemed to be a common theme: BIM Content. BIM was the hot topic, and if you missed Dennis Neeley's presentation on BIM, you missed a quality presentation on the direction BIM is heading. He outlined how far it has come in the last year and showed how several companies are utilizing the power of BIM.

As part of the Reed Construction Data booth, I witnessed several manufacturers' introduction to BIM and the need for their specific BIM content. Architects, engineers, manufacturers, owners, and software developers all spoke about content. It seems there will never be enough content to satisfy everyone, and if that is the case then how will BIM proceed? In speaking with some engineers, they expressed dissatisfaction with the parameters within the content; they could not get the content to schedule correctly. Another mentioned that they could not find quality content. Also, an architect told me that his consultants refuse to use BIM because of the lack of quality content. Another architect said that his consultants were heavily involved with BIM and were trying to use the content any way possible to better leverage their design.

Is there a solution? Not in the short-term. Users that are satisfied with currently available content will be the ones encouraging manufacturers to produce more specific content. Other users will sit back and wait while until the content is available and easy to use. Content is such an important aspect in BIM Models that hopefully all parties involved will work together to solve this issue in our industry.

Who could really help us solve this problem? Owners. If our clients get heavily involved in the BIM process and start demanding manufacturer-specific BIM content for their facilities, then we will see tremendous growth in the content market. Some manufacturers such as Old Castle Building Envelope and Mono-Systems wiring products have taken the lead in producing quality BIM content, and I am sure that other manufacturers will not want to be left behind as we move further into virtual construction.

To be successful in BIM today, you must use a positive approach regarding the present state of BIM content. The current content market is expanding rapidly, however, precautions should still be taken to avoid corrupting your models. I recommend that you build the content yourself, download it from the manufacturer, or get it from content creation vendors such as SmartBIM Objects from Reed.

Member Comments

» View all comments (1 total comments)
06/14/2010 - posted by Zane Paxton
There are really two differing needs that architects and engineers have for BIM families/objects. 1. Early on in the project, we need a COMPLETE set of generic objects or at least those that are useful "industry standards". The generic objects may be acceptable to the end of a project. For instance, if the project is being competitively bid and the contractors may be making substitutions anyways. Historically, Architects has always used more generic "Symbols" to represent objects. At the design progresses, we are not so concerned about who makes the door as what it's features for functionality and code requirements are. What is maddening is not being able to model a project as basic as a simple commercial project. Where's the conference table with chairs that AutoCAD had in the box? A decent panic bar, exit sign, toilet accessories, plumbing fixtures, fire hydrants, PIV's, site furniture and basic windows, roof hatches, skylights, etc. etc. As an exercise, I sat down and made a (finite) list of these items that is only around 150-200 generic objects that are needed for a basic commercial project, really! Of course every special building type will need its own generic objects. A hospital will need a whole list of specialties for instance. The challenge is that even with Reed's 20,000+ objects, there isn't a complete enough set of all the needed objects/families to complete even a simple commercial project! 2. Families based on real products and components. The challenge is that no matter what it will never, ever be close to 100% complete and will always be changing. But we will still need them for a host of good reasons. We need both. I really wish that Reed or someone will step up to the plate and start doing some useful, practical generic objects with Parametrics and features that can be added and subtracted by checking off check boxes. I've talked to the inside people at Autodesk and they seem both frustrated by the endless and never complete task of producing real objects and yet being very committed to continuing to the idea of trying to work on the endless never complete task within the bounds of their limited funding to do so. (Hint: Doesn't that look like an opportunity for Reed?)
Post Your Own Comments 
» Register or Login to post your comments on this article

Related News & Information

Related Channels

   Community Login | Register

Search Site

Advanced Search


What's Hot

Take a Demo!


Recent News

E Newsletter

Do You Know?

How BIM could impact your business? The BIM Handbook can help.

Learn how!


Resource Center

© 2010 Reed Construction Data Inc. All rights reserved. Any commercial use of this Site is strictly prohibited, except as provided in the Terms & Conditions or to the extent that we otherwise approve. To request approval to use Site content, please see our Reprint/Licensing page. | Privacy Policy

For inquiries concerning RBI Publications, please click here.